European transfer window explodes! Manchester City grabs 75 million, Manchester United poaches with feelings, and renews the contract with plaids has become the biggest controversy

Chelsea's first signing was like "not short of money but careful calculations" - 22.27 million euros were counted, and Portugal Sports' 20-year-old midfielder Essugo was brought. This child played well at the Portuguese U21, broke Figo's record in his debut and became the youngest player in the team's history. Logically speaking, such a "future star" should be supported by a treasure, but the Blues are better, so they are directly positioned as Kesedo's substitute. Let’s just say that Kesedo was in that state last season. Isn’t it a bit extravagant to spend a lot of money to buy a substitute? But then I thought about it, Chelsea has been buying people in the past two years and is now suddenly starting to invest “precisely”? He played the Club World Cup at the age of 20, and even if he sat on the bench, he would see the world. If Kaisedo got angry or had a broken condition one day, wouldn’t he have a backup plan? The transfer fee is precisely the second decimal point of the euro, which is like calculating the wrong account. I don’t know if Portugal Sports Finance has obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Manchester United's "children's dream" metaphysics: Mbemo is leaving the Champions League without playing, but insists on wading into Manchester United's muddy waters?

Brentford's Mbemo is one of the brightest dark horses in the Premier League this season, with 20 goals and 7 assists in 38 games, and it is a hot spot wherever you put it. Newcastle, Tottenham and Arsenal all held up Champions League tickets and said, "I have wanted to wear Manchester United jerseys since I was a child" - this is the legendary "Son Demon Dream" filter, right? What is the situation with Manchester United now? The Champions League qualification was not won, and Tenghager's coaching position was like a roller coaster, and his recruitment budget was still stuck. Brentford asked for £50 million, which was higher than his 55 million euros worth, which was clearly accurate for Manchester United to be short of strikers. The key is, can Mbemo play in the Champions League when he comes here? The Europa League will be guaranteed next season, if it fails again... But on the other hand, has Manchester United relied on the "Son Demon Dream" to pick up treasures in recent years? Januzai? Lingard? Forget it, let’s look at the negotiation results first. Anyway, fans are used to the repeated jumps of hope and disappointment.

Manchester City's "Art of Hushi": Is it worth buying a newly renewed midfielder of 75 million euros?

Manchester City's operation is simply a textbook for "rich and willful" - Reindez just renewed his contract with Milan until 2030 in March, and in May he quoted 60 million euros. After being rejected, he directly added 75 million euros, and dug people from San Siro to Etihad. This midfielder has 15 goals and 4 assists in 53 games this season. Serie A is all top data, let alone going to the Premier League to feed Haaland. But the question is, is Manchester City really lacking a midfielder? Although De Bruyne is old, after Gundogan leaves, there will be Rodri and Bellingham... Oh yes, Bellingham seems to have gone to Real Madrid. So Guardiola is planning ahead and changing the midfielder in advance? It was just a miserable Milan fans. They sold the person as soon as they renewed their contract, and the management's face was slapped. But then again, buying a true core of 75 million euros is much more cost-effective than buying a substitute for Chelsea. Manchester City is good at playing.

Atletico Madrid's "sensual contract renewal": Is it time to wake up with Griezmann's dream of La Liga championship?

Atletico Madrid renewed its contract with Griezmann until 2027. This operation is not so much a strengthening, but rather a "pension contract" - the 34-year-old plaid, who played 442 games at Atletico Madrid and scored 197 goals, becoming the team's recorder king, but he was not in the team when Atletico Madrid won the La Liga championship twice. After two years in Barcelona, ​​the best result in the league was runner-up. He played 530 games in La Liga, and he didn't even touch the league championship medal. Now that the contract has been renewed for two years, unless Atletico Madrid suddenly explodes or Real Madrid and Barcelona are collectively frustrated, they will have a bad dream of winning the La Liga championship. But on the other hand, who cares about the championship for Atletico Madrid fans? As long as the grid is still running on the field, shouting "Beauty in the Prosperous Times" is done. Besides, in his current state, he is more than enough to be a substitute, and renewing his contract is more about sentiment. As for his achievements, let's go with the flow.

Lazio's "frying cold rice and changing coach": What new tricks can Sarri come up with the second time in the palace?

Lazio fired Baroni, invited Sarri back, and signed a "2+1" contract. In the last year, he was linked to the qualification of the Champions League - no matter how he looked at it, it looked like "sick and seeking medical treatment." Sarri coached Lazio for the first time and took the lead for two and a half years. Her best result was sixth in Serie A, and she didn't even touch the shadow of the European War. Come back now, expect him to lead these veterans into the Champions League? However, Sarri had won the Serie A championship at Juventus and the Europa League at Chelsea, and he still had experience. It is Lazio's lineup, which is seriously aging and has a limited budget. Sarri's pass and control style has high physical requirements. Can these 30-year-old players run? Besides, what is the success rate of the coach who "entered the second palace"? Ancelotti is an exception, Sarri... Don't get rid of get out of class too quickly and you'll be successful.

Under the gold and dollar football, which one is more important, sentiment or achievement?

After reading this round of transfer news, I suddenly found that the wealthy clubs were divided into two factions: Manchester City and Chelsea spent money to buy combat power, Manchester United bet on the future by "Son Demon Dream", Atletico used the contract extension to retain his feelings, and Lazio repeatedly jumped between cost-effectiveness and experience. Some people say that football is becoming more and more utilitarian nowadays, the transfer fee is ridiculously high, and the player loyalty is like paper. Look at Reindez, who just renewed his contract and changed his job; Mbemo refused to play in the Champions League and insisted on going to Manchester United for a risk. But on the other hand, professional players only have a golden period of just a few years, and it is understandable to pursue high salaries or wealthy platforms. But Atletico Madrid's renewal of Griezmann's operation makes people feel a bit "counter-trend" - in this era of data first, there are fewer and fewer clubs willing to pay for their feelings. But then again, if all teams only look at the results and commercial value, will football be less humane? So the question is: When gold and dollar football swept everything, is a player like Griezmann who is "unce crown but long-lasting" scarce or "useless sentiment"? Perhaps the answer depends on whether you care more about the trophy showroom or cherish the cheers in the stands more.