289 Sports > Football > Türkiye and Spain have similar advantages and disadvantages, but 6-0 shows the difference in grades between the two

Türkiye and Spain have similar advantages and disadvantages, but 6-0 shows the difference in grades between the two

Football

The national team competitions in recent days have mostly been scored by large scores.

However, Spain's match against Türkiye would not have to continue this tone. According to the performance in the European Cup, Spain's technical excellence is naturally not to be said, and Türkiye also performed well in the European Cup, showing a relatively solid foundation.

In this game, Turkey was indeed unable to resist his opponent in defense, and was eventually beaten into a sieve by Spain's counterattack, but Turkey also made some content, and if it could make a little adjustment, even if it was a little luck, it would not be shaved into a bald head.

So, this game is still worth talking about.

In this game, both teams basically sent out most of their main lineups.

On Spain, Heisen, Pedri, Yamal and Nico all started. Although they did not show serious center players, like in the European Cup, Oyasabal played in this position, but Merino was also sent in the midfield. In addition, Lenorman, who was mainly responsible for the destruction, also guarded the backcourt.

So, the overall quality is still very good.

Turkey, which is fighting at home, has no reservations when facing a strong opponent, especially on the technical level, Cialhanoglu, Guerre and Irdiz all appeared. With these names alone, Turkey should at least play some content on the offensive end. So after the opening, Turkey hit the frontcourt with a long ball, forming a long-range attack:

However, when he turned around, he was attacked by Spain in sports wars and set pieces. In the 6th minute, Pedri successfully kicked the ball in the second line and scored the first goal: In fact, Turkey's defense is fragile, and it can be seen from this conceding. Regardless of the defense line of the four defenders, the protection in front of the defense line is not in place. Even if it is at home, such a defense is difficult to support the uproar.

The only hope is actually only on the offensive end.

So in the 8th minute, Turkey played a good line, Guerre took the back to handle the ball, and moved the long pass to the left, and Irdez and his teammates threatened:

This is actually a good idea, but the limitation is that Turkey's center is not outstanding enough, and the tactical effect is not clear, so it cannot suppress Spain's central defender, so it cannot create space for Irdez to get closer to the goal:

Therefore, Turkey's offense cannot be played stably, so Spain has the chance to score the second goal at any time, not to mention that they have better personal abilities as support:

In this case, Turkey actually needs to change its thinking a little.

Gulell handled the ball from behind and organized the midfield with Calhanoglu, and found a way to score between the two lines. This is a very important thing:

However, between the two lines, Turkey always lacks a stable receiving point. At this time, it should be considered to let Irdez move into the middle, rather than waiting for the ball on the left or on the weak side. After all, Turkey's center is not strong enough, and it is difficult to use a retreat to meet the midfield.

But this center is not unthreatening. While being short, it also has a certain impact. In a suitable scenario, Heisen's weakness can still be hit. Just like this attack, while Guerre took the back and stepped into the two lines with the help of his teammates, he contacted the running center, thus hitting the center:

Therefore, in addition to Irdez waiting on the weak side to catch the ball, Turkey's offensive methods should be more abundant. Irdez's position can be more flexible, and he can enter the middle lane to respond, so as to try to play more mid lane attacks.

Unfortunately, Turkey obviously did not have such a way of thinking, so shortly after this middle attack, Spain scored the second goal, and was able to kick the ball in the second line:

In contrast, Turkey's next response was still to move to the left, allowing Irdez to shoot near the corner of the penalty area:

}}}

. During this period, Spain was actually very close to scoring the third goal, and the threat of counterattack had been pulled up:

{9 0}

The reason why we have some regrets about Turkey's offense is that it is actually in front of Spain's defense line, especially after leading two goals, Turkey does not have a chance to get a goal back:

Guerre has sufficient room for play in the second line area, so the left and right sides can also play some space. Unfortunately, the efficiency is very low, both on the back line and on the back line..

So, this made Spain feel the pressure on the defensive end, but it also gained sufficient room for counterattacks. So before the end of the first half, Spain counterattacked many times, thus scoring the third goal:

The score has naturally no more ideas, and scoring a goal has actually become a more practical goal. So in the second half, Julaire's position was moved to the left half, thus getting closer to Irdez and others, which brought a Some help:

, but the efficiency was still not achieved, so it was gradually penetrated by Spain's repeated counterattacks, changing the score from 0-3 to 0-6:

From this score, you can feel that Turkey does not have any defensive ability, which drags the team down.

In fact, it is somewhat extravagant to put Cialhanoglu on the back midfield based on such a backcourt. The coach can completely consider letting Cialhanolu play in the front position, so as to arrange additional engineers on the back midfield line. When there is a ball, Cialhanolu and Guillail can retreat to help and switch to a midfield to attack. When there is no ball, at least a more solid foundation is formed in the middle and backcourt, which is a relatively safe idea.

Of course, Türkiye may not have any particularly suitable candidates. Poking each other may be the team's idea and best idea, but this efficiency is still a bit low. In addition, it is a bit rigid on the line.

Especially in terms of using Ilditz, when the center also needs more support, it is actually a luxury to place an attacking player fixed on the wing.

As for Spain, there is nothing to say.

Although they have exposed some of their defensive flaws. Even with Lenor Mann, you cannot expect the right center back to effectively provide strength elements and destructive effects in every round and direction. Just like Barcelona's forced use of Araujo, without the assistance of corresponding full-backs or midfielders, it is just as unrealistic to expect to build a backcourt with excellent strike ability.

So, like Turkey, Spain also needs to play through the frontcourt and offense. They have better technical level, so they are more efficient, and they won a big victory in this way.

A six-goal victory in one game and a six-goal defeat in one game, which is how it is produced.

source:www 7m com

Related Posts

Links