Analysis of the Club World Cup final on Sunday, Paris and Chelsea, daily unpopular warning!

Chelsea vs Paris

Club World Cup final, US President Trump came to watch the game in person and expressed his full efforts to host next year's World Cup!

Chelsea's Club World Cup journey can be regarded as "hard battles to temper history". From the 1/8 final overtime win to the 2-1 defeat of Fruminense in the semifinals, the Blues proved with their 6-game 5-1 record: they are best at striking their edge in adversity. New aid Pedro became the most critical "variable". The 24-year-old Brazilian striker contributed 4 goals and 2 assists in the knockout stage, and his 78% finishing rate in the penalty area increased Chelsea's counterattack efficiency by 30%. Enzo Fernandez's midfield control (91% pass success rate + 3.2 key passes per game) is the core of the team's ability to control the rhythm when the ball possession rate is less than 50%.

Paris Saint-Germain's path to advance is "Occurrence Textbook". From sweeping Atletico Madrid 4-0 in the group stage to defeating Real Madrid 3-0 in the semi-finals, the team averaged 2.8 goals per game. The wing wings formed by Dembele and Kvaratskhelia contributed a total of 21 goals and 18 assists, and their 63% one-on-one success rate made all defenses frightened. What's even more terrifying is that Paris's "everyone is a soldier" - In addition to the forward trident, the goal-scoring ability of midfielder Dué (11 goals and 8 assists this season) and defender Skriniard (3 set-pieces) makes the team's offensive layer far exceed that of the opponent.

Key showdown: The three major battlefields that determine the outcome

Pedro VS Skriniar

Chelsea striker's "change acceleration" (success rate 62%) will directly test the defensive resilience of the Paris right-back. Although Skriniar averaged 2.1 interceptions per game, facing Pedro's "cycle + sudden cut" combination punch, teammates may need to assist in defense - this will create space for Chelsea's midfielder.

Enzo VS Vitinia

The contest between the two South American midfielders is a "brain showdown". Enzo's long pass schedule (89% accuracy) and Vitinia's short pass penetration (4.2 straight passes per game), whoever can control the midfield rhythm will win the team's offensive initiative. It is worth noting that Enzo has better pass stability under high pressure (78%) than Vitinia (71%).

Set offense and defense

Chelsea's corner kick conversion rate is 15%, Thiago Silva's back-point encirclement is a killer move; Paris is the best player with 28% of the set-piece scores, and Skriniard's header and Dembele's tactical corner kick cooperation (5 assists) are extremely threatening. Given the tension in the finals, set pieces could be the key to breaking the deadlock.

Winning and Losing Hands: Three variables that rewrite the ending

Final Experience: 7 players including Thiago Silva and Enzo in Chelsea have experience in the Champions League finals, while only 5 people in Paris have participated in the finals of the competition. This psychological advantage may have a decisive impact in a stalemate.

Fitness critical point: The average age of Chelsea's main lineup is 27.3 years old, 1.2 years younger than Paris, and more suitable for high-intensity confrontation. In the Paris semi-finals, the main force's physical reserve may fall behind by 10%.

Referee Scale: Argentine referee Laparini is known for being "loose" (17.2 fouls per game), which will condone Chelsea's high-pressure pressing, but may also allow Paris' skilled players to gain more space for holding the ball.

Summary of this game: In this final, Paris is more optimistic about a small victory, or a draw, and is optimistic about 1-2, 2-2, and tie!

Below is the unpopular warning for today's event!